Difference between revisions of "IDempiere/FullMeeting20150805"

From WikiQSS
(full meeting)
 
(drop JIRA notifications from log)
 
Line 63: Line 63:
 
'''''Deepak__''''': But NPE that you told on organization tree is not able to reproduce<br>
 
'''''Deepak__''''': But NPE that you told on organization tree is not able to reproduce<br>
 
'''''red1''''': my changes is simply to remove that field<br>
 
'''''red1''''': my changes is simply to remove that field<br>
'''''Not-f4e9''''': [IDEMPIERE] deepak updated IDEMPIERE-2675 Attachment set to "IDEMPIERE-2675_1.patch"<br>
 
'''''Not-f4e9''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2675<br>
 
 
'''''red1''''': sorry, now i know that you referring to<br>
 
'''''red1''''': sorry, now i know that you referring to<br>
 
'''''red1''''': OK, for that you select the other standard menu i think a Primary Menu and then there is a right item<br>
 
'''''red1''''': OK, for that you select the other standard menu i think a Primary Menu and then there is a right item<br>
Line 70: Line 68:
 
'''''red1''''': and I did not patch that at all<br>
 
'''''red1''''': and I did not patch that at all<br>
 
'''''red1''''': just informing u of it<br>
 
'''''red1''''': just informing u of it<br>
'''''Not-f4e9''''': [IDEMPIERE] deepak updated IDEMPIERE-2675<br>
 
'''''Not-f4e9''''': [IDEMPIERE] I am not able to reproduce error mentioned by Red1. Please note that IDEMPIERE-2675_1.patch contains all changes, also correction given by Red1 in same patch.<br>
 
'''''Not-f4e9''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2675<br>
 
 
'''''red1''''': if it does not happen, then it is my case only probably<br>
 
'''''red1''''': if it does not happen, then it is my case only probably<br>
 
'''''Deepak__''''': I tested with organization<br>
 
'''''Deepak__''''': I tested with organization<br>
Line 89: Line 84:
 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': great<br>
 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': great<br>
 
'''''Deepak__''''': Red1, If your error continue, We can do sometime screen sharing again to look what is wrong. Sorry I do not have spinsuite setup here yet<br>
 
'''''Deepak__''''': Red1, If your error continue, We can do sometime screen sharing again to look what is wrong. Sorry I do not have spinsuite setup here yet<br>
'''''Not-f4e9''''': [iDempiere] CarlosRuiz_globalqss pushed 1 commit to release-2.1 [+0/-0/±1] https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/commits/<br>
 
'''''Not-f4e9''''': [iDempiere] globalqss f695038 - IDEMPIERE-2747 Env.parseVariable doesn't work with CreatedBy/UpdatedBy<br>
 
'''''Not-f4e9''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2747 status set to "Resolved" -assignee set to "Carlos Antonio Ruiz Gomez" -resolution set to "Fixed"<br>
 
'''''Not-f4e9''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2747<br>
 
 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': nmicoud, I think I found a better patch for IDEMPIERE-2747 - can you please test it?<br>
 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': nmicoud, I think I found a better patch for IDEMPIERE-2747 - can you please test it?<br>
 
'''''nmicoud''''': sure<br>
 
'''''nmicoud''''': sure<br>
Line 114: Line 105:
 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': added the link to the Downloads page<br>
 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': added the link to the Downloads page<br>
 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': http://www.idempiere.org/downloads<br>
 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': http://www.idempiere.org/downloads<br>
'''''Not-f4e9''''': [iDempiere2.1] jenkins built #268 completed (success) http://ci.idempiere.org/job/iDempiere2.1/268/<br>
 
 
'''''hieplq''''': hi @CarlosRuiz, wdyt about IDEMPIERE-2754<br>
 
'''''hieplq''''': hi @CarlosRuiz, wdyt about IDEMPIERE-2754<br>
 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': yes - I agree if that's not used ok<br>
 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': yes - I agree if that's not used ok<br>
 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': hieplq, the commits from experimental are already deployed to experimental test server?<br>
 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': hieplq, the commits from experimental are already deployed to experimental test server?<br>
'''''Not-f4e9''''': [IDEMPIERE] hieplq updated IDEMPIERE-1379<br>
 
'''''Not-f4e9''''': [IDEMPIERE] I has some idea with this issue. please help me review it. 1. at the moment, in menu window, form, workflow, process, report ... has difference icon. but sale order window and bpartner window has same icon (even bpartner window has owner icon at tab) it worth for set each menu has owner icon. priority is: if image is set at info (window, process, form, info window), set this icon for menu item. also set<br>
 
'''''Not-f4e9''''': for tab ico and dashboard ico if image is not set at info (window, process, form, info window), use category type icon (one for window type, one for info window,....) 2. at the moment, info window has image URL field. it's text type and it use for icon in dashboard menu. i think it should convert to image type and also use for tab icon and menu as description at (1).<br>
 
'''''Not-f4e9''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1379<br>
 
 
'''''hieplq''''': hi @CarlosRuiz. not yet. i want finish all before rebuild<br>
 
'''''hieplq''''': hi @CarlosRuiz. not yet. i want finish all before rebuild<br>
 
'''''hieplq''''': i has comment for IDEMPIERE-1379. and i want discuss about it.<br>
 
'''''hieplq''''': i has comment for IDEMPIERE-1379. and i want discuss about it.<br>
 
'''''hieplq''''': i want finish experience in this week<br>
 
'''''hieplq''''': i want finish experience in this week<br>
'''''Not-f4e9''''': [iDempiere] CarlosRuiz_globalqss pushed 2 commits to development [+4/-0/±6] https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/commits/<br>
 
'''''Not-f4e9''''': [iDempiere] dpansheriya da0c037 - IDEMPIERE-2675: Adding custom table support in Tree<br>
 
'''''Not-f4e9''''': [iDempiere] globalqss cf97100 - IDEMPIERE-2675: Adding custom table support in Tree<br>
 
'''''Not-f4e9''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2675 status set to "Resolved" -assignee set to "Deepak Pansheriya" -resolution set to "Fixed"<br>
 
'''''Not-f4e9''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2675<br>
 

Latest revision as of 13:16, 5 August 2015

Table of Contents | Full Meeting Minutes | Full Meeting 2015-08-05

CarlosRuiz: Good Morning
nmicoud: Bonjour
a42niem: Guten Tag
nmicoud: Carlos, could you have a look at ticket https://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2747 (little patch, but i'm not sure i've choose the good way to resolve it) ?
CarlosRuiz: sure
nmicoud: thanks
a42niem: i have created a virtual machine to allow people to test iDempiere 2.1 more easily (hopefully)
a42niem: it is available at https://sourceforge.net/projects/idempiere/files/IVA/
a42niem: before further advertising it i thought it could be good if some of you guys here could have a look and try
CarlosRuiz: great Dirk - thanks a lot - I'll try to check it
a42niem: fine, thanks
CarlosRuiz: a42niem, IVA is working perfect
CarlosRuiz: which is root password?
a42niem: great Carlos
a42niem: idempiere
a42niem: :)
red1: Hi Dirk, congrats, and its only 660Mb.. what flavour of virtual m/c is it?
red1: on what O/S?
norbertbede: hi all
CarlosRuiz: :-) seems it recognize my keyboard as german keyboard
CarlosRuiz: Hi norbertbede
a42niem: it is based on alpine linux which had been developed to be resource efficient
a42niem: it does not use glibc but musl libc and busybox
a42niem: CarlosRuiz - well that made it simpler for me...
CarlosRuiz: :D noticed when typing the y and z :D
a42niem: and hi Redhuan, and thanks
red1: Halo norbertbede
norbertbede: i have a specific question:
norbertbede: thinking here about possibility to implement on info window (on top on custom view - lists sales order lines ) - zoom button. any idea is it possible ? we know this for a specific window e.g. product on product info
norbertbede: the goal is open sales order
norbertbede: any hint would be hepful
nmicoud: when zooming from info window product, you want to open a specific window ?
a42niem: CarlosRuiz try setup-keymap (or tzpe setup-kezmap ;) )
norbertbede: @nmicoud yes we want to open sales order - but we have very specific complex view listing sales orderlines
nmicoud: write your own infoproduct.java class and override the onZoom (or zoom) method
red1: norbertbede: isn't the present InfoOrder already a custom extension of InfoWindow?
red1: wonder if u can copy that and reimplement?
nmicoud: you can extend InfoWindowProduct with YourOwnInfoProduct and just change the zoom method
norbertbede: thanks. we thought the awaited solution could be like reusable
norbertbede: that means we are able to this to any new info window
nmicoud: you wanted to add a new field on AD_InfoWindow ?
norbertbede: just we must write new java.class for all
CarlosRuiz: setup-kezmap worked a42niem :D
norbertbede: i'm not a developer, but probably new field could be cover this - with specific methods
CarlosRuiz: good to add that and root password in the README
nmicoud: did you try to play with the Zoom Condition ?
norbertbede: so make it more general
Deepak__: Redq1, On ticket IDEMPIERE-2675
Deepak__: I am not able to reproduce issue you reported
red1: hang on Deepak__ checking
norbertbede: yes, just there is not a good support based on tomasscikruha analysis of contextual variables
norbertbede: maybe that could be improved
red1: Deepak__: i thought you know that this field, isUseLuceneIndex is not needed right?
Deepak__: Red1, I took your changes and replacing in new patch
Deepak__: But NPE that you told on organization tree is not able to reproduce
red1: my changes is simply to remove that field
red1: sorry, now i know that you referring to
red1: OK, for that you select the other standard menu i think a Primary Menu and then there is a right item
red1: right panel item and clicking on it gives the NPE
red1: and I did not patch that at all
red1: just informing u of it
red1: if it does not happen, then it is my case only probably
Deepak__: I tested with organization
Deepak__: now let me test with menu
a42niem: CarlosRuiz the README is updated
norbertbede: thanks for ideas.
a42niem: i'll prepare a wiki page with more info
Deepak__: Carlos, I created patch for IDEMPIERE-2675 with latest version of iDempiere
Deepak__: Can you please do peer review and add into iDempiere 2.1?
CarlosRuiz: great Deepak__ - red1, do that affect the spinsuite? or is it compatible?
Deepak__: I think red1 need this feature for spinSuite
red1: Thats exactly what i trying to say... Deepak's contribution works on SpinSuite without me trying to adopt SpinSuite changes
CarlosRuiz: ah ok - I thought spinsuite implemented it in a different way - but is dependent
red1: at least for tree management but not tree node creation.
red1: yes SpinSuite is different and more core changes which i did not take when Deepak's was partially useful but enough as i just wanted tree display and draging them around
CarlosRuiz: great
Deepak__: Red1, If your error continue, We can do sometime screen sharing again to look what is wrong. Sorry I do not have spinsuite setup here yet
CarlosRuiz: nmicoud, I think I found a better patch for IDEMPIERE-2747 - can you please test it?
nmicoud: sure
nmicoud: will put it in our dev instance
CarlosRuiz: a42niem, a couple of suggestions for the IVA?
a42niem: sure
CarlosRuiz: maybe include the syncApplied2.1.sh - so it's easy to upgrade database
CarlosRuiz: I'm not sure if the plugins are updated - it could include also the update.sh pointing to the jenkins as another script - something like upgrade.sh - which calls update.sh and then syncApplied2.1.sh
CarlosRuiz: also - this is a suggestion - but is preferable to create an idempiere user and install as idempiere - instead of root
CarlosRuiz: I know is a virtual machine for testing - so this is not a big deal
a42niem: yes - i was undecided to provide this as a "pure" IVA and provide a nother one with more advanced content
a42niem: maybe containing also all plugins which would make it more heavy for download
CarlosRuiz: or just add a disclaimer on the readme - this is for testing purposes - installed as root - for production purposes is recommended to install as idempiere
CarlosRuiz: yes - the size is great
CarlosRuiz: I think just the "upgrade" script can do the trick - to not overload the IVA
a42niem: thats why i initially did not provide the password
CarlosRuiz: if people want to test the "latest" - is just to run the upgrade
a42niem: okay, its open source but it is just intended to be used for lightweight testing
a42niem: yeah, you are right
a42niem: i can give instructions how to use snapshots and then people can upgrade and maybe go back to a former snapshot
CarlosRuiz: added the link to the Downloads page
CarlosRuiz: http://www.idempiere.org/downloads
hieplq: hi @CarlosRuiz, wdyt about IDEMPIERE-2754
CarlosRuiz: yes - I agree if that's not used ok
CarlosRuiz: hieplq, the commits from experimental are already deployed to experimental test server?
hieplq: hi @CarlosRuiz. not yet. i want finish all before rebuild
hieplq: i has comment for IDEMPIERE-1379. and i want discuss about it.
hieplq: i want finish experience in this week