IDempiere/FullMeeting20150603
⇐ Table of Contents | Full Meeting Minutes | Full Meeting 2015-06-03
CarlosRuiz: Good Morning
nmicoud: Bonjour
nmicoud: Hello CarlosRuiz ; i updloaded a new patch for https://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2613 ; could you have a look please ?
CarlosRuiz: sure nmicoud - let me check
nmicoud: thanks
nmicoud: Also, any idea for https://groups.google.com/forum/?nomobile=true#!topic/idempiere/5O424-bIrho and https://groups.google.com/d/msg/idempiere/KhrVfOor3BU/Q36Y1vXyZmcJ ?
nmicoud: With little modification, it would become more user friendly :)
CarlosRuiz: I think both suggestions are correct
CarlosRuiz: the account dialog is very - very - very unfriendly
CarlosRuiz: that is a search window - but also create - and to create is not clear - if you push the refresh or reset - and save
nmicoud: do you have other enhacenement in mind
CarlosRuiz: maybe as Marco said - it could be remembering user to save before closing
CarlosRuiz: in general :-( I think the concept of "combination" is not very clear for users - and this dialog makes it worst
nmicoud: in fact they only want to play with accounts
CarlosRuiz: something that annoys me also using that is that the infowindow for the account requires to push the refresh button - doesn't work putting the account value and ENTER - I'm compeled to use the mouse
nmicoud: not sure if it easily feasible as this panel is based on tab
CarlosRuiz: yep - I think is general of info window
nmicoud: perhaps we should add a specific info window ?
Deepak_: I also want advise, should we change Attribute selection window's show all option to list all ASI involved with product transaction? Currently issue is if you do not have storage locator for that ASI it do not show
Deepak_: This force not to use storage cleanup process
Deepak_: Regarding info window, Should we add editable field support?
Deepak_: not related to account info window
nmicoud: Deepak_ : you mean editable field in the grid ?
Deepak_: yes
Deepak_: same like in adempiere smart browser
nmicoud: I have no use case in mind, but could be a useful feature
CarlosRuiz: don't know about smart browser - never tried - what is that used for? an example?
Deepak_: For example, Replenishment info window with user editable entry
Deepak_: So info window suggest qty and user can enter against suggestin
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2613
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] [~nmicoud], I just packed in RV_T_Aging_IDEMPIERE-2361.zip and the field currency disappear after I select the last saved param.
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2613
CarlosRuiz: but you need something else to process the user changes on grid
nmicoud: Carlos, for #2613 ; you tested it on v3 or 2.1 (I have tested it on 2.1)
nmicoud: i will try again
nmicoud: anyway
Deepak_: Carlos, we have process button for same in info window
CarlosRuiz: 2.1 nmicoud
nmicoud: O_o
nmicoud: will try it again
CarlosRuiz: I see Deepak - it sounds useful
CarlosRuiz: about ASI Deepak - I saw you posted that in forums - so is just showing ASI for products with qty in storage? - and you say it must show ASIs that have passed through inventory even if they were already sold?
Deepak_: Currently when we click on show all, it shows ASI with 0 qty on storage too
Deepak_: But if storage is cleaned up then it will not be there
Deepak_: Now say you get some customer returns, or want to do cost adjustment for that ASI, you don't have way to select such ASI
CarlosRuiz: storage cleanup is deleting records with zero qty?
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] nmicoud updated IDEMPIERE-2613
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] [~carlosruiz_globalqss] ; ok tested again and it works ! But here another use case that failed : - remove the display logic form C_Currency_ID - add display logic @DateAcct@ = Y for IsSOTrx Then launch the process, check Account Date and execute Open the report again and select last param. Account Date will be checked but IsSOTrx will remain hidden
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2613
Not-832d: [iDempiere] CarlosRuiz_globalqss pushed 1 commit to release-2.1 [+0/-0/±1] https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/commits/
Not-832d: [iDempiere] dpansheriya 20c11e5 - IDEMPIERE-2626 : Allowing to enter manual ASI on lines while even table is on exclude rule
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2626 status set to "Resolved" -assignee set to "Deepak Pansheriya" -resolution set to "Fixed"
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2626
CarlosRuiz: nmicoud, reproduced the second case with @DateAcct@ - reviewing
nmicoud: ok
Deepak_: Carlos, yes storage cleanup deletes record with 0 on hand which are updated older then 3 days
Not-832d: [iDempiere2.1] jenkins built #229 completed (success) http://ci.idempiere.org/job/iDempiere2.1/229/
CarlosRuiz: good Deepak - maybe a flag telling "Show All" - defaulting to show just those in stock
Deepak_: may we can add it on client info or system config
CarlosRuiz: I think is more user option - after you have a big history (years of serials for example) you must be interested to see historic serials just in a few cases
aguerra: buenos dias everybody!!!!
CarlosRuiz: Hi Alejandro
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] nmicoud created IDEMPIERE-2658 Show bpartner name instead of user name in description of allocations generated from Payment Allocation
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2658
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] nmicoud updated IDEMPIERE-2658 Attachment set to "IDEMPIERE.2658.patch"
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2658
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] nmicoud updated IDEMPIERE-2658 status set to "Peer Review Queue"
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2658
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] nmicoud updated IDEMPIERE-2658 labels set to "+Patch"
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2658
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] nmicoud updated IDEMPIERE-2658 assignee set to "Carlos Antonio Ruiz Gomez"
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2658
CarlosRuiz: nmicoud, seems there was a bug on my previous patch - committing the fix
Not-832d: [iDempiere] CarlosRuiz_globalqss pushed 1 commit to release-2.1 [+0/-0/±1] https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/commits/
Not-832d: [iDempiere] globalqss f70196d - IDEMPIERE-2613 Process saved params doesn't update Display and ReadOnly Logics
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2613 status set to "Resolved" -resolution set to "Fixed"
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2613
Not-832d: [iDempiere2.1] jenkins built #230 completed (success) http://ci.idempiere.org/job/iDempiere2.1/230/
nmicoud: CarlosRuiz, thanks for the last commit (on #2613), it works well !
CarlosRuiz: gr8
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] norbert.bede created IDEMPIERE-2659 Client Scheduler - generates report for multiple clients
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2659
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] norbert.bede created IDEMPIERE-2660 Generate Invoice Improvements
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2660
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] norbert.bede updated IDEMPIERE-2660 description set to "we found the following process could be improved well: * filter for product category - generate invoice for a specific category - foods * invoicing - split by salesman - invoice per order customers * generate invoice per order department/location - e.g 10 ship location 100 shipments 10 invoice in period * improve group by options (determine how lines
Not-832d: will be generated - lines orders and ) - group by shipment (actual behaviour) - no grouping - group by orders - group by address - group by shipments "
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2660
Not-832d: [iDempiere] CarlosRuiz_globalqss pushed 1 commit to release-2.1 [+0/-0/±1] https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/commits/
Not-832d: [iDempiere] sauljabin 342fc13 - IDEMPIERE-2655 Get Context Variable Error in WebService queryData
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2655 status set to "Resolved" -resolution set to "Fixed"
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2655
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2653 labels set to "+Patch WebServices"
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2653
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2653
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] wondering if this can be done using the new filter+context variables. if not possible, then I think is better not to hardcode upper but make it configurable.
Not-832d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2653
Not-832d: [iDempiere2.1] jenkins built #231 completed (success) http://ci.idempiere.org/job/iDempiere2.1/231/
